Q

Unit 5 Aspects of Contract and Negligence for Business - level 5 in business

Unit 5 Aspects of Contract and Negligence for Business Assignment Help - Hire tutors and gather Unit 5 Aspects of Contract and Negligence for Business assignment help - level 5 in business!
Previous << >> Next

Unit 5 Aspects of Contract and Negligence for Business - level 5 in busines

Task 1: Understand the essential elements of contract in business context

Task 1.1 Essential elements of contract

Task 1.2 is it possible to have a contract without face to face?

Task 1.3 Referring the case of Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co (1893), explain the effect of the words in the advertisement placed by the company informing the readers that it had placed £1000 with the Alliance Bank to meet any possible claim

Task 2: be able to apply the elements of contract in business situations

Task 2.1 Identify the elements present and that were not in contract between David and William

Task 2.2 when William informed David of the requirement to complete the work before 31st July 2014, was a contract formed between them?

Task 2.3 a) Discuss the position of David when he informed William on 25 June 2014 that he would not be able to complete the work before 31 July 2014, and was he in violation of the contract terms

Task 2.3 b) Explain the situation to David on his claim for the additional £2000 for completing his work before 31 July 2014

Task 3: Understand principles of liability in negligence in business activities

Task 3.1 How liability in tort may arise, give example and differentiate it from contractual liability

Task 3.2 what have to be proved by the claimant that court will establish tort of negligence has occurred

Task 3.3 Explain concept of vicarious liability with two examples where employer was held liable for action of their employee and two examples where they were not held liable

Task 4: Apply the elements of tort and negligence and defences in different business situations

Task 4.1 compare and contrast the verdict in Donoghue v Stevenson (1932) with Hill v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire (1989). What defences were used in each case? Give your view on the verdict of the second case. Do you consider it as a just verdict?

Task 4.2 Discuss the position of the taxi service in the given case, from the vicarious liability point of view


Want to Excel in Course? Hire Trusted Writers for Help! —> https://miracleskills.com/

Lists of comments


Leave a comment


Captcha